News of the second phase of...
We are delighted to announce that we have won an AHRC standard grant of £680,000 to enable us to continue this project from summer 2015 until the end of 2018....
We are delighted to announce that we have won an AHRC standard grant of £680,000 to enable us to continue this project from summer 2015 until the end of 2018....
On Monday 12 May 2014 Dr Giuliana Pieri met with two highly experienced teachers of Italian, Carmela Amodio Johnson and Barbara Romito to talk about their experience of interdisciplinarity in the classroom in a...
One of the key questions of the project relates to the ways in which interdisciplinarity in both theory and practice can inspire new patterns of teaching. Our collaboration with teachers...
The 2013 conference of the Association for the Study of Modern Italy, which took place on 22 and 23 November at the Institute of Modern Languages Research, London, put in...
The interest in taking interdisciplinary and interartistic approaches to Italian cultural figures continues, as a new project is announced on Luigi Ghirri: “Viewing and writing Italian Landscape: Luigi Ghirri and...
On the occasion of the last SIS Biennial Conference (Durham, 7-11 July), I organized a panel entitled “Italian transmedia culture: stories and storytelling across media” which included papers presented by...
Giuliana Pieri, in her paper on “Vision and Visuality in Italian Studies”, explored a surprising blind spot in the current field of Italian studies: the interdisciplinary field of Visual Studies....
Before the radical changes to the languages curriculum that began in the late 1980s, the study of literature and the language required to read it were the unique focus of...
Interdisciplinarity is everywhere seen as normative, necessary, and part of what we do, and need to do, as academics.It’s good, isn’t it, to bring in documentaries when we teach history?...
Experiment/Experience Pierpaolo Antonello’s contribution to the third Interdisciplinary Italy Workshop held at University College London, Saturday, 11th May 2013, can be accessed here: experimentexperience powerpoint ExperimentExperience paper
Fotografia circa 1968 I focus on the chiasmus that occurred between art, and photography in particular, around 1968 in Italy. By then artists had begun to creatively use photographic documents,...
Music/ theatre/ virtuosity: Berio, Berberian and Eco at the Studio di Fonologia Dr Steve Halfyard examined the work Luciano Berio did involving language with Umberto Eco and Cathy Berberian at...
Contrary to widespread viewpoints, recent developments in intermedial poetry seem to constitute a resurgence and intensification of particular features of lyric poetry rather than a break with tradition. Digital technology enables a far wider circulation and increases the visibility of those features — presentness, repetition, memorability, and shareability — that Jonathan Culler in his Theory of the Lyric (2015), and others, have outlined. A wider definition of lyric is therefore helpful for understanding the contemporary production and circulation of poems, the characteristics they share with premodern poetic practices, and the multilayered events in which they ‘happen’ and which may extend to their aural, visual, and kinetic dimensions. A lyric poem, for Culler, is iterable language open to being repeated by readers in a variety of contexts; readers are invited to reperform the poem in the ‘now’ of enunciation. Yet, what is it that makes the lyric particularly shareable?
Performance poetry is an ideal case to prompt reflection on this question. Italian poet and performer Lello Voce brought the poetry slam to Italy in 2001, and in 2004 seven thousand people attended a poetry slam in Perugia: unimaginable numbers for traditional poetry readings. In his 2014 conversation with Lello Voce in Monza, Marc Kelly Smith, American poet and founder of the poetry slam movement in Chicago in 1987, remarks that ‘the competition is a game’, ‘a theatrical device’, ‘a type of show’. It was designed to be ‘a mockery of competition’: he says that five random audience members judge the artwork on a scale of one to ten, and points out that for years the prize in Chicago was simply cupcakes. Yet, if these events reclaim the ritualistic and collective dimension that poetry had for centuries, what do performers and audiences actually share during such events? How do they participate in an experience involving spoken words, body movements and often sound, as well as co-presence?
In May 2021, Italian performance artist Giuliano Logos won the XV World Poetry Slam Championship in Paris. One of the seven pieces he performed at the contest is Date loro fuoco. The title refers to the exhortation repeated throughout the poem and the exhortative mode is enhanced by a change in intonation. The recitation gets progressively louder and more agitated, but the utterance ‘date loro fuoco’ preserves a calm assertiveness throughout. Words, breath, voice and body movements all contribute to the performance of the gesture of exhortation. Gestures can move not only across languages, but also across media. The video recording of the performance in front of an audience and the online performance in front of a camera foreground two different ‘events’ of the poem. In the first video, the people addressed by the plural ‘you’ are those in the room, not those watching the recording. The experience of the poem is collective, even though not all spectators in the room may feel equally included in that collectivity, whose boundaries are drawn by the if-clauses that introduce the exhortation. In the second video, ‘we’ are the viewers addressed by ‘you’.
These two videos exemplify two ways of understanding lyric poetry: 1. poetry as heard, the reader feels that the words of the poem are addressed to them; 2. poetry as overheard, the words are addressed to someone else and the reader is overhearing them. This shift is made possible by the affordances of the digital medium, but has always been structural to the lyric and is based on the fundamental gesture of deixis. The lyric makes the most of the deictic power of language and, more generally, of an open referentiality: its language points to something or someone external to the text. The poem does not create a fictional world and referentiality is not fulfilled within it. Based on the text, we do not know for sure who is included in the ‘you’; this is only defined in the event of the poem. Feeling addressed by the poem’s gesture not only entails participation, but can lead to specific responses. When circulated on social media, YouTube or other dedicated platforms, gestures can be reenacted by members of the expanded audience, who in turn may respond to the poem by producing new poems that perform the same gesture.