<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Pasolini; intermediality; Erich Auerbach Archives - Interdisciplinary Italy</title>
	<atom:link href="https://interdisciplinaryitaly.org/tag/pasolini-intermediality-erich-auerbach/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://interdisciplinaryitaly.org/tag/pasolini-intermediality-erich-auerbach/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Apr 2023 14:44:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-GB</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.3</generator>
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">108376730</site>	<item>
		<title>Pasolini&#8217;s Intermediality: Translating Auerbach&#8217;s Literary Theory into Film Practice</title>
		<link>https://interdisciplinaryitaly.org/pasolinis-intermediality-translating-auerbachs-literary-theory-film-practice/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Emanuela Patti]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 May 2016 17:16:39 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogposts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Modernism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Postmodernism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pasolini; intermediality; Erich Auerbach]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.interdisciplinaryitaly.org/?p=4667</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Throughout his career, Pier Paolo Pasolini (1922-1975) experimented across a variety of artistic media, including poetry, fiction, cinema, drama, and painting. Yet it is in his early cinema – the so-called &#8220;national-popular phase&#8221;, including Accattone (1961), Mamma Roma (1962), La Ricotta (1963) and Il Vangelo secondo Matteo (1964) – that he first originally interpreted the...</p>
<p>L'articolo <a href="https://interdisciplinaryitaly.org/pasolinis-intermediality-translating-auerbachs-literary-theory-film-practice/">Pasolini&#8217;s Intermediality: Translating Auerbach&#8217;s Literary Theory into Film Practice</a> sembra essere il primo su <a href="https://interdisciplinaryitaly.org">Interdisciplinary Italy</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Throughout his career, Pier Paolo Pasolini (1922-1975) experimented across a variety of artistic media, including poetry, fiction, cinema, drama, and painting. Yet it is in his early cinema – the so-called &#8220;national-popular phase&#8221;, including <em>Accattone </em>(1961), <em>Mamma Roma</em> (1962), <em>La Ricotta</em> (1963) and <em>Il Vangelo secondo Matteo </em>(1964) – that he first originally interpreted the &#8220;conceptual fusion&#8221; of different arts, taking inspiration from a text of literary criticism translated into Italian in 1956: Erich Auerbach&#8217;s <em>Mimesis. The Representation of Reality in Western Literature.</em> Such a crucial encounter between literary and film theory in his work was recorded by Pasolini himself soon after his collaboration with Federico Fellini for <em>Le notti di Cabiria </em>in 1957: &#8220;Fellini dragged me through that countryside lost in a honey of ultimate seasonal sweetness as he told me the plot of the <em>Nights</em>. A Peruvian kitten next to the big Siamese tomcat, I listened, Auerbach in my pocket&#8221; (&#8220;Nota su <em>Le notti&#8221;</em>). Auerbach is not simply evoked <em>per allegoriam </em>here, but he proves to be the main model through which Pasolini rethought representation from literature to cinema. In particular, two concepts had a strong impact on his cinematographic style: the &#8220;mingling of styles&#8221; and &#8220;figural realism&#8221;.</p>
<p>In <em>Mimesis</em>, the German philologist and comparativist identified two significant moments in literary history, in which the traditional separation of &#8220;high&#8221; and &#8220;low&#8221; styles was surpassed: the history of Christ, which combined everyday life and sublime tragedy; and the <em>Divine Comedy</em>, which, drawing on the Christian tradition, again mixed divine and human elements. The concept of <em>figura</em> was employed instead to explain how Dante represented his historical characters as a prefiguration of their divine destiny. Figural interpretation establishes indeed a connection between two facts or people, in which one of them is not self-referential in its meaning, but also means the other; and the other also includes and resolves the former.</p>
<p>The originality of Pasolini&#8217;s intermediality is based on the manner in which he translated Auerbach&#8217;s concept of &#8220;mingling of styles&#8221; into a form of hybridization of artistic media, at the same time using the concept of <em>figura </em>to create semiotic interconnections between the protagonists of his films (Accattone, Ettore, Stracci, and Jesus Christ) and the <em>figura Christi. </em>The attractive feature of <em>Mimesis </em>was for Pasolini the radical mingling of &#8220;high&#8221; and&#8221; low&#8221; cultures, as a revolutionary characteristic of Christian religion (Christ impersonating at once <em>altitudo </em>and <em>humilitas </em>in his life and passion). Pasolini&#8217;s early films can be seen in fact as a progressive figural approximation to the passion of Christ, first only suggested through symbolic associations with music (such as Bach&#8217;s in <em>Accattone</em>), paintings (such as Mantegna&#8217;s <em>Cristo morto </em>or Pomtorno&#8217;s <em>Deposizione, </em>in <em>Mamma Roma</em> or <em>La ricotta </em>respectively), and sculptures (the figure of the Angel and the cross in <em>Accattone</em>), and then through the full identification with Christ in person in <em>Il Vangelo secondo Matteo</em>. The mingling of styles was thus used in his cinema as an aesthetic strategy to re-define the hierarchical boundaries of social representation. At the same time, through his figural realism, Pasolini constructed the filmic discourse on his &#8220;poveri Cristi&#8221;, the dimension of sacredness, namely of &#8220;exclusion&#8221; from society (in Agamben&#8217;s definition of <em>homo sacer</em>), being his form of resistance to Italian society in the 1960s.</p>
<p>[This topic is discussed more extensively in this recently published book: Emanuela Patti, <em>Pasolini After Dante. The &#8220;Divine Mimesis&#8221; and the Politics of Representation</em>, (Oxford: Legenda, 2016)</p>
<p><img data-recalc-dims="1" fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" class="alignnone wp-image-4684 size-medium" src="https://i0.wp.com/interdisciplinaryitaly.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/mock_1.jpeg?resize=210%2C300&#038;ssl=1" alt="mock_1" width="210" height="300" /></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>L'articolo <a href="https://interdisciplinaryitaly.org/pasolinis-intermediality-translating-auerbachs-literary-theory-film-practice/">Pasolini&#8217;s Intermediality: Translating Auerbach&#8217;s Literary Theory into Film Practice</a> sembra essere il primo su <a href="https://interdisciplinaryitaly.org">Interdisciplinary Italy</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">4667</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
