News of the second phase of...
We are delighted to announce that we have won an AHRC standard grant of £680,000 to enable us to continue this project from summer 2015 until the end of 2018....
We are delighted to announce that we have won an AHRC standard grant of £680,000 to enable us to continue this project from summer 2015 until the end of 2018....
On Monday 12 May 2014 Dr Giuliana Pieri met with two highly experienced teachers of Italian, Carmela Amodio Johnson and Barbara Romito to talk about their experience of interdisciplinarity in the classroom in a...
One of the key questions of the project relates to the ways in which interdisciplinarity in both theory and practice can inspire new patterns of teaching. Our collaboration with teachers...
The 2013 conference of the Association for the Study of Modern Italy, which took place on 22 and 23 November at the Institute of Modern Languages Research, London, put in...
The interest in taking interdisciplinary and interartistic approaches to Italian cultural figures continues, as a new project is announced on Luigi Ghirri: “Viewing and writing Italian Landscape: Luigi Ghirri and...
On the occasion of the last SIS Biennial Conference (Durham, 7-11 July), I organized a panel entitled “Italian transmedia culture: stories and storytelling across media” which included papers presented by...
Giuliana Pieri, in her paper on “Vision and Visuality in Italian Studies”, explored a surprising blind spot in the current field of Italian studies: the interdisciplinary field of Visual Studies....
Before the radical changes to the languages curriculum that began in the late 1980s, the study of literature and the language required to read it were the unique focus of...
Interdisciplinarity is everywhere seen as normative, necessary, and part of what we do, and need to do, as academics.It’s good, isn’t it, to bring in documentaries when we teach history?...
Experiment/Experience Pierpaolo Antonello’s contribution to the third Interdisciplinary Italy Workshop held at University College London, Saturday, 11th May 2013, can be accessed here: experimentexperience powerpoint ExperimentExperience paper
Fotografia circa 1968 I focus on the chiasmus that occurred between art, and photography in particular, around 1968 in Italy. By then artists had begun to creatively use photographic documents,...
Music/ theatre/ virtuosity: Berio, Berberian and Eco at the Studio di Fonologia Dr Steve Halfyard examined the work Luciano Berio did involving language with Umberto Eco and Cathy Berberian at...
When some years ago I went to see Tullio Pericoli in his studio in Milan, to interview him on his pictorial work around Robinson Crusoe, on which I was then working (the outcome of this research can be read now in S. Corso (2013), Pericoli told me that for some time he had been obsessed with an idea. He wished to arrange a meeting with a writer and ask him what it meant for him to describe a face. “I know – he told me – what goes on in my mind when I work on a portrait, what I look for, what I seek to understand, what I have to remember. But what does a writer look for? How does his mind work when he describes a face?”. Paolo Fabbri had told him an anecdote that had struck him, and that, he recalled, was narrated in Diderot and d’Alembert’s Introduction to the Encyclopédie. A wealthy man is madly in love with a woman. He drafts a description of her face, makes a hundred copies and commissions one hundred painters to create her portrait. When the painters deliver the portraits, the man discovers that there is not one that resembles another; and above all it turns out that none of the portraits bear any resemblance to the woman he loves. The anecdote of the enamoured Frenchman addresses some of the most intricate problems in aesthetic theory across the ages: what do we represent when we represent? Is narrating with words an experience comparable to that of narrating with images? Can one exist without the other? Can there be a visual imagination without the words that mold us or a verbal experience that is free from the images that we carry inside? In his long and successful career Tullio Pericoli has never ceased to contemplate these questions, and has answered them with his art, his curiosity, his extraordinary ability to watch and listen to faces, behaviors, but also trees, clouds, soil. As a political and cultural cartoonist, as illustrator of literary works, as a world-famous author of writers’ portraits, as landscape painter, set designer, and finally as a theorist of his own artwork, Pericoli teaches us that behind every stroke of the pen or the brush, there are a thousand stories. With lucidity and generosity, Pericoli opens the gates of his art and invites the curious viewer to stroll between the lines of his paintings – lines which, as he likes to say, have a history, a physiognomy, a grammar and even an interiority.
Simona Corso (2013), “Immaginare Robinson Crusoe. Tullio Pericoli e gli altri”, in Oltre la pagina. Il testo letterario e le sue metamorfosi nell’era dell’immagine, edited by M. d’Amico (Roma, Edizioni di Storia e Letteratura, pp. 35-61.
As part of the Interdisciplinary Italy programme, Tullio Pericoli is talking at an event in London this week (Wednesday 2nd March). You can find more details here.