News of the second phase of...
We are delighted to announce that we have won an AHRC standard grant of £680,000 to enable us to continue this project from summer 2015 until the end of 2018....
We are delighted to announce that we have won an AHRC standard grant of £680,000 to enable us to continue this project from summer 2015 until the end of 2018....
On Monday 12 May 2014 Dr Giuliana Pieri met with two highly experienced teachers of Italian, Carmela Amodio Johnson and Barbara Romito to talk about their experience of interdisciplinarity in the classroom in a...
One of the key questions of the project relates to the ways in which interdisciplinarity in both theory and practice can inspire new patterns of teaching. Our collaboration with teachers...
The 2013 conference of the Association for the Study of Modern Italy, which took place on 22 and 23 November at the Institute of Modern Languages Research, London, put in...
The interest in taking interdisciplinary and interartistic approaches to Italian cultural figures continues, as a new project is announced on Luigi Ghirri: “Viewing and writing Italian Landscape: Luigi Ghirri and...
On the occasion of the last SIS Biennial Conference (Durham, 7-11 July), I organized a panel entitled “Italian transmedia culture: stories and storytelling across media” which included papers presented by...
Giuliana Pieri, in her paper on “Vision and Visuality in Italian Studies”, explored a surprising blind spot in the current field of Italian studies: the interdisciplinary field of Visual Studies....
Before the radical changes to the languages curriculum that began in the late 1980s, the study of literature and the language required to read it were the unique focus of...
Interdisciplinarity is everywhere seen as normative, necessary, and part of what we do, and need to do, as academics.It’s good, isn’t it, to bring in documentaries when we teach history?...
Experiment/Experience Pierpaolo Antonello’s contribution to the third Interdisciplinary Italy Workshop held at University College London, Saturday, 11th May 2013, can be accessed here: experimentexperience powerpoint ExperimentExperience paper
Fotografia circa 1968 I focus on the chiasmus that occurred between art, and photography in particular, around 1968 in Italy. By then artists had begun to creatively use photographic documents,...
Music/ theatre/ virtuosity: Berio, Berberian and Eco at the Studio di Fonologia Dr Steve Halfyard examined the work Luciano Berio did involving language with Umberto Eco and Cathy Berberian at...
Dario Fo (1926-2016) absorbed a wide range of arts into the field of theatre. Trained as a painter and architect, he entered the world of theatre and radio broadcasting in 1951. He wrote, acted, directed, designed, choreographed, composed music and songs, and produced political theatre throughout his career, except for a two-year spell in Cinecittà where he starred in Carlo Lizzani’s film Lo svitato (1956) and was a scriptwriter for a number of film directors. Later in his career, painting became prominent in his work. His eclectic skills therefore, drew from the world of design, painting and music to build stage sets and choreography, music and songs for his theatre.
In La signora è da buttare (1967) Fo used circus setting and techniques to construct theatrical action able to give metaphorical meaning to the play. Drawing on a stylistic form used by Mayakowsky and Mayerhold, Fo employed summersaults, slaps, magic tricks, acrobatics – even two professional clowns, the Columbaioni – animation of objects, and imaginary circus animals, to create symbolic, metaphoric images for his political satire. In Grande pantomima con bandiere e pupazzi piccoli e medi (1968) he borrowed from puppetry to construct allegories of Fascism using The Big Puppet, the King’s stupid puppet and others to signify categories of power, along with a huge dragon to represent people. In Tutti uniti! Tutti insieme! Ma scusa, quello non è il padrone? (1971) Fo turned to music. Instead of words, his characters communicated only with sounds made from musical instruments. Circus and puppetry and the medium of music enabled Fo to widen his means of communication with the public. He increased the theatricality of the medium adding visual representations, gestures and actions, and expanded its vocabulary giving musical sounds the status of words. This highly allegorical theatre allowed political satire and hindered censorship.
In Il funerale del padrone (1969) Fo used cinematic techniques, probably inspired by Sergei Eisenstein’s “intelligent montage” (Strike, 1924) by means of which two unrelated images, the slaughter of a bull and the workers charged by the police, when juxtaposed construct the meaning (workers killed by police), which is unrelated to the images when shown separately. Similarly, Fo set out to slaughter a lamb on stage against the background of a worker being crucified. The meaning conveyed was of a worker murdered like a lamb, which contained a further reference to Christ as the Lamb murdered for humanity. In his Manuale dell’attore (1987) Fo acknowledged his use of film techniques in describing his performance of Storia della tigre. He refers to a “spettatore con la cinepresa in testa”, a spectator who observes through the lens of a camera, receiving and reading images according to the different cinematic angles employed by the actor. Eisenstein’s technique enabled Fo to draw correlations between images, creating a virtual meaning in the mind of the audience, that was not evident from the single image and, at the same time, avoiding the constraint of the censor.
Beatrice Tavecchio Blake, Dario Fo: Teatro di attivazione e comunicazione 1950-1973, Milano, Mimesis, 2016. ISBN 978-88-5753-804-4