News of the second phase of...
We are delighted to announce that we have won an AHRC standard grant of £680,000 to enable us to continue this project from summer 2015 until the end of 2018....
We are delighted to announce that we have won an AHRC standard grant of £680,000 to enable us to continue this project from summer 2015 until the end of 2018....
On Monday 12 May 2014 Dr Giuliana Pieri met with two highly experienced teachers of Italian, Carmela Amodio Johnson and Barbara Romito to talk about their experience of interdisciplinarity in the classroom in a...
One of the key questions of the project relates to the ways in which interdisciplinarity in both theory and practice can inspire new patterns of teaching. Our collaboration with teachers...
The 2013 conference of the Association for the Study of Modern Italy, which took place on 22 and 23 November at the Institute of Modern Languages Research, London, put in...
The interest in taking interdisciplinary and interartistic approaches to Italian cultural figures continues, as a new project is announced on Luigi Ghirri: “Viewing and writing Italian Landscape: Luigi Ghirri and...
On the occasion of the last SIS Biennial Conference (Durham, 7-11 July), I organized a panel entitled “Italian transmedia culture: stories and storytelling across media” which included papers presented by...
Giuliana Pieri, in her paper on “Vision and Visuality in Italian Studies”, explored a surprising blind spot in the current field of Italian studies: the interdisciplinary field of Visual Studies....
Before the radical changes to the languages curriculum that began in the late 1980s, the study of literature and the language required to read it were the unique focus of...
Interdisciplinarity is everywhere seen as normative, necessary, and part of what we do, and need to do, as academics.It’s good, isn’t it, to bring in documentaries when we teach history?...
Experiment/Experience Pierpaolo Antonello’s contribution to the third Interdisciplinary Italy Workshop held at University College London, Saturday, 11th May 2013, can be accessed here: experimentexperience powerpoint ExperimentExperience paper
Fotografia circa 1968 I focus on the chiasmus that occurred between art, and photography in particular, around 1968 in Italy. By then artists had begun to creatively use photographic documents,...
Music/ theatre/ virtuosity: Berio, Berberian and Eco at the Studio di Fonologia Dr Steve Halfyard examined the work Luciano Berio did involving language with Umberto Eco and Cathy Berberian at...
When do conferences break new ground? One can think about individual presentations, or panels, that stand out as paradigm shifting – though this is often a tall order in the short twenty-minute span available to speakers. Most conferences in the Humanities still follow the traditional format of papers, panels and keynote addresses. It is a tried and tested way to present ideas, new interpretations, and spark debate. Press Play: Creative Interventions in Research and Practice, hosted by MACRO and the British School at Rome (28-29 March 2019), and organised by a team led by Emma Bond and Derek Duncan (both based in the Italian department at the University of St Andrews) took things in a different direction. The conference aimed to fuse together academic research, creative practice, and civic engagement in a combined conference and exhibition. Both the central thematic concerns and the format of the conference and associated events were innovative. It is the first academic conference I attend in which the organizers have created a space for thinking through making rather than simply thinking through scholarly discourse and debate.
The presence of creative practitioners was key in injecting a different perspective and approach to the objects of study. Conference papers often focus on the outcomes of research, presenting them as a (more or less) stable set of results. Creative artists were both more openly focussed on the process of making/doing, and more at ease with using the conference as a place to experiment and try things out: if the process is as important as the outcome (or indeed it is the outcome itself) a space opens up in which one is more willing to take greater creative and intellectual risks.
This is why, rather than presenting a traditional paper, I ran a creative thinking lab: ‘Beyond Logos and Techne: Creative Responses to Italian Feminist Art’. The focus was a series of works by the Italian visual poet and pioneer video artist Ketty La Rocca (1938-76) titled Riduzioni in which she transformed an initial photographic image, until only the memory traces of the image were left.
The workshop participants were both academics and artists. We used a selection of photographs from the BSR Photographic Archive: iconic Roman monuments and sculptures, and equally iconic artists who resided at the BSR—Winifred Knights and Barbara Hepworth. The selection of the images was in itself a moment of dialogue and co-production with archivist Alessandra Giovenco. During the creative lab we did our own Riduzioni (using paper, pen and ink) and displayed them at the end of the day in the conference exhibition. The outputs were thus both individual and collective. The intention was to reflect on the role of practice as critical thinking by responding to La Rocca’s work and shifting our default position of critical thinking through words. It was a modest attempt to place techne rather than logos first, in line with La Rocca’s creative and theoretical preoccupations, nudging our work towards collaborative creative critical thinking.